The Madhya Pradesh High Court has provided a significant interpretation of the Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976, offering relief to elderly pensioners. In a recent ruling, the Court observed that the date for reckoning 80 years of age for the benefit of additional pension should be counted from the date when a person enters their 80th year, rather than when they complete 80 years.
The ruling was delivered by a Bench led by Justice Anand Pathak in a case involving a 90-year-old petitioner, a former Professor Emeritus and Dean of Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Medical College, Jabalpur. The petitioner had also served as a professor of Paediatrics and Director of the Residency Training Program at King Faisal University and King Fahd Teaching Hospital, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
Advocate Aditya Sanghi represented the petitioner, while Government Advocate Lokesh Jain appeared for the respondents.
The petitioner's grievance stemmed from the State Government's refusal to grant him a 20% additional pension from the date he entered his 80th year in October 2011, as provided under the Pension Rules. Despite his repeated representations, the government failed to address his concerns, prompting him to seek judicial intervention.
Justice Pathak, while interpreting the relevant Circular, underscored that the intent of the lawmakers was not to exclude the 80th and 90th years from the calculation of pension benefits. The Court found the government's interpretation unreasonable and anomalous, noting that it would unjustly exclude a critical year from pension calculations.
“The petitioner is in the twilight zone of his life span, and the date for reckoning 80 years for the benefit of additional pension is to be counted from the date when a person enters the 80th year of age, not when he completes 80 years,” Justice Pathak remarked.
By applying a purposive interpretation of the law, the Court concluded that excluding the 80th year from pension calculations would defeat the objective of supporting elderly employees. The Court's ruling ensures that senior citizens will receive their rightful pension benefits without unnecessary delays or denials.
This judgment is expected to set a precedent, clarifying the interpretation of pension rules for the elderly across the state and ensuring that senior citizens receive the benefits they are entitled to as they age.
🕑 02 Jul, 2025 10:03 AM
Commutation Relief In Sight? Panel Likely To Review 15-Year Deduction Rule
🕑 12 Jun, 2025 08:12 AM
8th Pay Commission: Uncertainty Looms as Employees Await Terms of Reference
🕑 24 Apr, 2025 10:21 PM
Staff Side constitutes panel for drafting memorandum to 8th CPC when formed
🕑 24 Apr, 2025 10:17 PM
8th Pay Commission likely to be set up by mid May
🕑 09 Apr, 2025 10:27 AM
Loan EMIs to get Cheaper as RBI cuts Repo Rate sgain | See the benefit
🕑 04 Apr, 2025 04:49 PM
AICPI-IW declines again, may affect DA hike in July 2025
🕑 02 Apr, 2025 08:27 AM
8th Pay Commission update: Standing Committee of NC-JCM to meet on April 23
🕑 09 Jun, 2025 08:25 AM
π’ UPS vs NPS: The Retirement Dilemma Facing 27 Lakh Government Employees
🕑 04 Apr, 2025 04:46 PM
NPS To UPS Switch from April 1: A Detailed Look at the Option to Switch
🕑 30 Mar, 2025 11:01 AM
8th Pay Commission implementation may get delayed till 2027 β Hereβs why
🕑 27 Mar, 2025 10:25 PM
7th CPC wanted a permanent pay panel, end DA revision twice
🕑 27 Mar, 2025 08:43 AM
8th Pay Commission: What Kind Of Salary Hike Can Be Staff Expected?
🕑 20 Mar, 2025 08:24 AM
Why the commuted pension is restored after 15 years, not 12 years
🕑 17 Mar, 2025 08:37 AM
π Expected Dearness Allowance (DA) from January 2026 Calculator