A recent decision by a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court, comprising Justices Sanjeev Sachdeva and Manoj Jain, has dismissed a claim for pro rata pension made by discharged Indian Air Force personnel. The court ruled against the petitioners, who belonged to the categories of PBOR (Personnel Below Officer Rank) and NCO (Non-Commissioned Officer) and had served in the Air Force for 10–15 years. Their main grievance was the sudden termination of their services and the denial of their pension rights.
The petitioners argued that they should be entitled to the pro-rata pension since they had completed a decade of service. They also contested a Ministry of Defense letter that established certain conditions for pro rata pension eligibility, specifically for those joining a Central Public Enterprise.
On the other side, the respondents contended that the petitioners were not eligible for regular pension (due to their service duration being less than 15 years) or pro rata pension (because they were discharged for being unsuitable). The respondents asserted that the pro rata pension is typically granted only when an official is absorbed into another government organization, with a minimum qualifying service of 10 years.
The court agreed with the respondents, noting that the petitioners hadn't served for 15 years, so regular pension was not applicable to them. Regarding pro rata pension, the court clarified that it applies to officials who continue to serve in a different central government organization after completing 10 years of service through proper channels.
The court made a distinction between the petitioners and officials discharged on the grounds of unsuitability, emphasizing that those who are discharged cannot claim parity with individuals who continue to serve in a different government organization. The provision for pro rata pension is meant to safeguard officials absorbed into another government organization, ensuring they are not at a disadvantage.
The court also held that the Ministry of Defense's letter was in line with the objective of pro rata pension, which applies uniformly to all officials who continue to serve in another central government organization. The court found no discrimination or policy violation, ensuring equal treatment among those in similar circumstances.
🕑 08 Dec,23 10:42a.m.
Timeline for transfer on mutual exchange for non-gazetted railway employees
🕑 07 Dec,23 10:45p.m.
46,000 CAPF personnel opted for early retirement over the past five years
🕑 07 Dec,23 6:40p.m.
Lok Sabha Q&A : Extra attempt and age relaxation for UPSC CSE
🕑 07 Dec,23 6:30p.m.
Fixed Medical Allowance (FMA) to Pensioners under NPS
🕑 07 Dec,23 9:18a.m.
Lok Sabha Q&A : CGHS cashless treatment facilities in AIIMS & PGIMER
🕑 07 Dec,23 6:44a.m.
Rajya Sabha Q&A : Implementation of the five-day work in banks
🕑 06 Dec,23 9:57p.m.
Employees of autonomous bodies not entitled to same benefits as Govt Employees
🕑 06 Dec,23 7:15p.m.
Rajya Sabha Q&A: Clarifying Pay Disparity between CCS(RP) Rules 2008 & 2016
🕑 06 Dec,23 7:11p.m.
Guidelines on Acceptance of Awards by Government servants
🕑 08 Dec,23 11p.m.
DoT to discontinue paper-based KYC for enrolling mobile users from Jan
🕑 08 Dec,23 10:42a.m.
No hike in EMIs. RBI keeps repo rate unchanged at 6.5%
🕑 07 Dec,23 12:47p.m.
BJP’s electoral success casts doubt on reverting to old pension system
🕑 07 Dec,23 7:01a.m.
Discover 8 Financial Benefits for Central Govt Employees Post-Retirement
🕑 03 Dec,23 3:49p.m.
BJP's Victory: Boon or Bane for Central Government Employees?
🕑 19 Nov,23 10:17a.m.
Understanding the Andhra model of guaranteed pension system
🕑 11 Nov,23 11:02p.m.
Deceased govt employees’ spouses now eligible for Sr. Citizen Saving Scheme
🕑 08 Nov,23 10:12p.m.
DOP&PW poblishes compendium of pension related instructions