None
Skip to mainIn a recent order, the Supreme Court has made certain significant observations which expand the traditional meaning of family.
"Familial relationships may take the form of domestic, unmarried partnerships or queer relationships", the Court observed, while holding that atypical family units are also entitled to the equal protection of the law.
A bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud and AS Bopanna made these observations in a judgment delivered on August 16(but which was uploaded a few days ago), while granting the relief of maternity leave to a Central Government employee regardless of the fact that she had availed child care leave for the children of her husband from his earlier marriage.
The top court made the observation in a verdict while holding that a working woman cannot be denied her statutory right to maternity leave for her biological child only because her husband has two children from a previous marriage and she had availed the leave to take care of one of them.
The judgment authored by Justice Chandrachud made certain notable observations regarding "atypical" family units which are also entitled to equal protection of the law as under :
"The predominant understanding of the concept of a "family" both in the law and in society is that it consists of a single, unchanging unit with a mother and a father (who remain constant over time) and their children. This assumption ignores both, the many circumstances which may lead to a change in one‟s familial structure, and the fact that many families do not conform to this expectation to begin with. Familial relationships may take the form of domestic, unmarried partnerships or queer relationships. A household may be a single-parent household for any number of reasons, including the death of a spouse, separation, or divorce. Similarly, the guardians and caretakers (who traditionally occupy the roles of the "mother" and the "father") of children may change with remarriage, adoption, or fostering. These manifestations of love and of families may not be typical but they are as real as their traditional counterparts. Such atypical manifestations of the family unit are equally deserving not only of protection under law but also of the benefits available under social welfare legislation".
🕑 24 Mar, 2024 08:01 AM
Minutes of the DC/JCM (Railways) and Staff Side Meeting held on 15-16 Feb
🕑 20 Mar, 2024 09:23 AM
Pensioners Samaj on discrematory nature of railway Notional Increment order
🕑 20 Mar, 2024 09:14 AM
BSNL non-executive staff wage revision: Record of Joint Committee discussion
🕑 19 Mar, 2024 10:36 AM
50% for CDA pattern employees of CPSEs in 7th CPC pay
🕑 18 Mar, 2024 01:16 PM
Changes in Reimbursement of Children Education Allowance as per NEP 2020
🕑 18 Mar, 2024 01:13 PM
Holiday declare for 14th April, 2024 – Birthday of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar
🕑 18 Mar, 2024 01:04 PM
Revised Flexible Complementing Scheme for Scientists
🕑 15 Mar, 2024 09:33 AM
Dearness Relief to Central Government pensioners from January 2024
🕑 14 Mar, 2024 02:07 PM
Govt bans 18 vulgar 18 OTT. See the list here
🕑 08 Mar, 2024 01:49 PM
Pension Scheme Gains Traction Across States, Despite Central Hurdles
🕑 20 Feb, 2024 11:17 PM
CGHS rate for general surgery applicable from February 1, 2024
🕑 08 Feb, 2024 10:19 AM
No loan interst change as RBI maintains repo rate at 6.50% for the 6th time
🕑 07 Feb, 2024 08:28 PM
The Evolving Role of Pay Commissions in India: Mandatory or Myth?
🕑 05 Feb, 2024 03:50 PM
How much you take home increase after DA hike?
🕑 03 Feb, 2024 07:59 PM
Guaranteed Benefits in NPS: Election Gambit or Endgame for Retirees?
🕑 03 Feb, 2024 07:46 PM
Budget 2024. Benefit up to ₹ 25000. One in eight taxpayers to benefit