None
Skip to mainRecently the central government has framed “standard operating procedure” regarding the appearance of the Government officials before courts in litigation involving the Government.
The SOP suggests that the presence of Government officials should be required in courts, only in exceptional cases and not as a regular practice.
However, Justice DY Chandrachud has expressed apprehensions, interpreting this move as an attempt by the central government to exert control over judicial reviews.
Under Article 50 of the constitution, there exists a clear demarcation between the executive and judiciary, and the government's intervention in determining who should be summoned or not is raising concerns. The government's recent focus on court conduct, more than seven decades after the constitution's inception, has drawn attention. The judiciary, a foundational pillar alongside the executive and legislature, serves as a check against unchecked executive actions. Throughout history, the judiciary has intervened to curb executive abuses of power.
The SOP suggests cautious treatment of Government officials, who, despite being public servants, are subject to the court's impartial judgments – judgments that inherently uphold the public's interests. This juxtaposition begs the question: Should there be a distinction in the court's treatment between public servants (Government officials) and ordinary citizens? The central government appears to seek a constitutional interpretation that aligns with their authoritative inclinations, potentially influencing court decisions to align with their ideology.
This incident occurs against the backdrop of the central government's ongoing critiques directed at the judiciary. These criticisms span issues ranging from judge appointments to case backlogs. Notably, former law minister Kiren Rijiju has even proposed the inclusion of executive figures within the judiciary. By intervening purportedly to foster a more harmonious relationship between the judiciary and the government, the central government's increasing involvement in daily court matters generates concerns. Therefore, it seems prudent to reject the suggested SOP entirely in order to safeguard the independence of the judiciary.
🕑 21 Oct, 2024 08:52 PM
Finance Ministry order on July 2024 DA enhancement
🕑 16 Oct, 2024 09:57 PM
Cabinet approves 3% DA hike from July 2023.
🕑 11 Oct, 2024 07:19 PM
Wait for DA hike cabinet approval getting longer
🕑 11 Oct, 2024 07:14 PM
Government Announces New NPS Contribution Guidelines for CG Employees
🕑 11 Oct, 2024 07:02 PM
PM directs action against non-performing or corrupt government employees
🕑 11 Oct, 2024 11:12 AM
Ad-hoc Bonus for 2023-24 for Central Government employees announed
🕑 10 Oct, 2024 05:35 PM
8th Pay Commission may reintroduce DA merger to Basic Pay at 50%
🕑 04 Oct, 2024 09:59 AM
Rate of Interest on GPF and similar funds for Oct-Dec, 2024
🕑 04 Oct, 2024 09:52 AM
Cabinet approves Productivity Linked Bonus for 78 days to railway employees
🕑 04 Oct, 2024 10:05 AM
PFRDA introduces Balanced Life Cycle Fund option
🕑 08 Aug, 2024 11:46 AM
RBI Keeps Key Interest Rate Unchanged to Tackle Inflation
🕑 23 Jun, 2024 08:47 AM
8th Pay Commission: How much pay hike central govt employees expect?
🕑 20 Jun, 2024 05:59 PM
Finance Minister May Increase Income Tax Exemption in Budget 2024
🕑 18 Jun, 2024 03:34 PM
The Impact and Expectations Surrounding the 8th Central Pay Commission
🕑 07 Jun, 2024 10:13 AM
Indian Members of Parliament: Compensation and Benefits
🕑 10 Apr, 2024 08:35 AM
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan Admission Guidelines 2024-2025
🕑 05 Apr, 2024 01:23 PM
Kendriya Vidyalaya Balvatika Admission Schedule - 2024-25
🕑 02 Apr, 2024 09:25 AM
Kendriya Vidyalaya Admissions Open for 2024-25: Key Dates & Appln Process